“They took out the largest ticket saleswoman”: John Fury’s statements about Tyson’s losses in USYK and potential trilogy

John Fury claims his son Tyson Fury deserved to win two fights against Oleksandra USYKA but judges “Steals” That from him. He says that people who pay for anger (34-2-1, 24 ko) “probably” could not “afford to pay Tyson” the same amount of dough if he retained the title in the first fight.

The way he has been performing lately has never won any of the best candidates to get gold Trilogy Payday. Fury is already dirty rich. I don’t know why he would take him a salary on the third day against USYK.

Tyson looks completely washed in 37, and would be food for competitors. With a 0-2 record in the last two fights, Fury does not deserve the world title against Usyk. It’s not fair to the competitors that Tyson remains a chance to give him without going to the back of the line.

“Stolen” fights

“He had his belts, didn’t he? They performed the biggest ticket salesman from the game. If you want mega-bucks, you have to include the Gypsy king,” said John Fury SecondsTalking that Tyson Fury lost the title of WBC’s heavyweight category by Oleksandra Usyka last year in May in their first fight. “When someone paid you a (tone) of money, it seems that he resents you to stay champion, right?”

John really arrives here, right? He implies that the financial investment has played a role in judges who do not make him a decision. The fans agreed with the decisions made by the judges in both Fury-Usyk fights. They saw Fury rocking in the boots in the first fight and was saved by the judge when he was on his feet in the ninth round of their first fight.

“For my money, they probably didn’t want to pay him the same amount of money,” John continued. “He probably couldn’t afford to pay Tyson the same money again when he let him the champion. He was not in the best form for the second. For me (Fury) he won both fights. He needed more rest for the first. He assumed.

To blame the aversion

Notice the excuses from John? This is a classic denial. He tries to protect Fury to see him as a loser. He paints Fury as a sacrifice to get some sympathy from fans and motivates them to advocate for the trilogy. There is no demand for this fight, but if a sufficiently gullible fans believe that Gyspy King has been robbed, it will create interest.

Stopping that Fury was robbed, John helps to create a false narrative that he had done injustice. If John can make fans believe that there has been a robbery, Fury should not risk his hiding against one of the best candidates to earn a third lucrative mega-pm.