Doadarash calls Uber crime moves against the opponent’s competition

Theodash and Asking the court to end A case with uber in February, calling and not working and a “mourning methods and readers.” Uber received a higher level of US service at the beginning of this year, suppliment By means of food supplements to use its own functions. At that time, Uber said that the damaged “restaurant” was to pay large trees from the restaurant that also sold food on Uber. It also called a terrible dordash to the opposing restaurant in his list if available on the Uber feeds. But by walking off, Dronanish said Uber cases do not protect competition but to avoid.

The food production said that Uber “failed to give seller, consumers, and the shipping of the Uber complaints. The company explained that the law has a “enemy protection, not competitors.”

Meanwhile, Uber told Anchcrunch Portrdash was “understanding well” his complaint. “The restaurant is forced to decide between innocent or revenge, it’s not a competition – it’s a compulsion,” talk. San Francisco County court, California is prepared for Uber cases on July 11.