Physical Address

304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

Fear of Paulie Malignaggi of the boxer league, Turks Alalshikh and who Dana White


Per Frank Bay: Former Pug Paulie Malignaggi was critical of Turkish Alalshikh and Dana White lately on his Podcast Paulie TV. Paulie is a good clock because it is fun, and at the same time understands the internal effect of boxing.

He finds true, and allows you to know that he doesn’t like Dana White. He states that there may be a little bias to the day and Turks because it works for Pro box TV. Paulie let her know that his platform Pro box TV and Tuki Alalshikh are competitors in boxer business. He states that Turks forbade Pro box TV to have access to their events. There were other platforms for boxer platforms on social networks in what seems to be the case not to kiss the ring, which is also deprived of access to Turkish boxing events. This has raised red flags in the industry, which Paulie is trying to do.

Red flags

Paulie says he will still talk about Turki’s venture with Dan White, who -om, which is more objective. Listening to what Paulie TV had to say, my ears appeared. I want to share my thoughts about Paulie’s examination of the desired 2026 league Turks and Dana White.

By scales and canvas ladder

The questions that were arisen were based on the leakage of the ladder paying entry fighters and the ranking system to pay the fighter. The reported salary ladder was that of the newly signed initial fighter. For those who are not sure what it is, this is what the amateur would be ready to turn to be guaranteed based on a minimum.

It is designed to pay off the fighters quite based on the ranking system. It would start ranking at the bottom, and your salary would grow if, for example, you grew up on #15, then #10, then #5, and so on. As this differs from, say, a prominent Olympian signed by the main promoter, the provisions would pay much more for less struggles, simply because of the talent genera.

Paulie asks why a top talent would go with Turkish just to be a pigeon minimal equal to far less talent, as long as you travel a much firmer path? This new league system pays and ranking would not make sense of top future talents to start their career with Turkish ‘Who’.

Benefits and disadvantages?

Paulie claims that top talents are more appropriate to go with established promoters such as Top Rang, as they proved to be the best talent guides. The best talent with Top Rank will be paid a lot more guaranteed minimums as they travel the road to the championship. During this ride, Top Rank will match them as carefully as possible, usually between 10 and 15 fights, which fans consider cannon food or undermine a record level of fighting. Paulie says this is good for a young fighter.

Elaborating that after they reach the ranking of the body to sanction their salary, they will increase significantly. As a fan, we see that Top Rank is one of the best in running (ie production) their talent. The case only recently, Keyshawn Davis. Davis was considered the talents of the highest level after turning. Top Rank managed to install Keyshawn in the champion without much problem.

Keyshawn could bear his record with 10 to 12 fights of relative cannon food. Allowing him to be placed in the main position with the organization of ranking like WBO until he got his title. Davis was fortunate to have been with Top Ranko, who also had a champion at the time, Denys Berinchyk, thus relying on the title. The warning is that Berinchyk was seen as the weakest champion of the relationship. Paulie would say that this situation is good for a fighter. Davis managed to make a little fight against happiness less than the star competition, on the way to becoming a champion in which he would earn a lot more money.

Paulie says who has different plans

Depending on how you look at the Keyshawn Davis situation, fans can consider it good for a fighter, but bad for boxing. Based on Paulie’s finding on how anyone plans to pay for his young fighters upcoming, it seems that the old way of building a fighter will be a thing of the past. Paulie thinks the way anyone plans to build their champions will ultimately turn out to be good for a company, but bad for fighters.

The young talent signed by Dana White and who will not be paid well so that the feast on taxi drivers could be scored for the great record 30-0 with 27kos. No, the outline of young fighters seems to match strongly from day one. They will be decent based on their effect. From the outside, it seems fair, but not Paulie. He sees this as the main problem if you want to build the main boxer stars.

The main argument, which seems to make a lot of sense, is simple that when young talent reaches the top, it will burn. Paulie, after being a fighter, claims that it is not difficult to fight in boxing after a difficult fight. A group of the best boxers who are consistently struggling with each other in hard fighting will lead to no one can climb and become a global superstar.

Everyone will pick up each other, and their skills and bodies will erode too quickly to have long maintenance careers like a legend of the past. Durans, Leonards, De la Hoyas and Canelos, contrary to belief, were carefully matched and guided. They did not fight the killer after the killer, believe it or not. They had shares of mediocre opponents, took the time or did not lead some fights.

On the way to the ladder, they did not immediately fight the best guys. Pauli says that this is how boxing works, and so you can manage and build guys who have 10, 15 or even a 20-year career. In who format you would be fortunate to have the ruling champion for more than 2 years. With who, yes, you would get great games from young candidates to champions, but it wouldn’t last long. After a few years, your talent pool would be seriously spent. For young fighters, it means that going with who you may do too much damage on the way to the championship that running will really be very short. And then what?

For fans, Paulie is correct or is it too stuck in the old ways of boxing work? And for your son to fight, which path would you lead him on? I agree with Paulie for the most part. I think anyone will be good for fans, but bad for fighters in the long run.

YouTube videoYouTube video

Last time updated 28.03.2025



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *