Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Senator Alex Padilla, D-Calif., Grilled Kash Patel, President Donald Trump’s Candidate to head the FBI, on Patel’s pro-Pistoles positions.
Asked by Padilla If Patel believes that fund controls in firearms purchases are constitutional during the candidate’s confirmation audience on Thursday, Patel replied that he did not know that “the details” but believed that “this is going say the Supreme Court. “
“You think the civilian property of machine guns is protected by the Second amendment? “Padilla fired.
Ex-FBI officer who closed Hunter Biden lines of research violated Hatch’s law with anti-trump places
“Everything that the courts govern in terms of the second amendment is the one that is protected by the second amendment,” Patel responded.
Padilla explained that his question line was due to a “association” between Patel and the Group Group owners of America, which enthusiastically approved Trump’s option to lead the FBI.
“Goa applauds Kash Patel nomination” Ferotly Pro-Canó “for the director of the FBI,” the organization said in a press relief after Trump’s announcement to play Patel.
Kash Patel, Trump’s selection for the FBI director, answers questions about Jan. 6, qanon, and more
Padilla expressed his concern about the enthusiasm approval, arguing that the organization has taken “extreme positions” about weapons.
“The America’s owners have taken extreme positions, including the position that all fund controls are unconstitutional and that the civil property of machine guns is protected under the second amendment,” said Padilla.
Padilla argued that Patel would be responsible for supervising some of the country’s most critical rules in the country to the FBIexpressing his concern that Trump’s candidate would not live up to the task.
Click here to get the Fox News app
“Allow you to remind you that, as director of the FBI, it will oversee critical responsibilities related to the regulation of firearms, you are administering the national instant criminal history review system. Yes, it is constitutional, it is in its place , for a reason!
“Given your hesitation, given your answers, I am worried about your ability to do the job when it is not aligned with views such as the America owners of America.”