Trump’s Silicon Valley advisers have AI ‘censorship’ in their ranks

President-elect Donald Trump surrounded himself with Silicon Valley entrepreneurs – including Elon Musk, Marc Andreessen, and David Sacks – who now advise him on technology and other issues.

When it comes to AI, the group of technologists agree on the need for development and implementation of AI throughout the US, there is one issue of AI security that this group brings up a little: the threat of “research” of AI from Big. Modern.

Trump’s Silicon Valley advisers could make AI chatbot solutions the new battleground for conservatives fighting their culture and tech companies.

AI censorship is a term used to describe how tech companies put their finger on the scale with their AI chatbot solutions to align with other politicians, or push their own. Some would say it’s control, which often means the same thing but has a very different meaning. As with social networks and search algorithms, finding the right AI solutions for real-life situations and controversial issues is always important.

Over the past decade, conservatives have repeatedly criticized Big Tech for bowing to government pressure and monitoring their platforms and services. However, some technology executives have begun to improve their public roles. For example, before the 2024 election, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg he apologized to Congress for favoring pressure from the Biden administration to act more aggressively regarding COVID-19. Not long after, Meta’s chief executive said he had “made a 20-year mistake” by taking too much responsibility for the problems his company controlled – and he said. he wouldn’t be making those mistakes again.

But according to Trump’s technology advisers, AI chatbots represent the biggest threat to free speech, and the most powerful form of speech control. Instead of twisting the search or feeding the algorithm to achieve what you want, such as downloading information about vaccinations, technology companies will now just give you a single, clear answer that does not include.

In recent months, Musk, Andreessen, and Sacks have spoken out against AI surveillance in podcasts, interviews, and television series. While we don’t know how they advise Trump, their alleged beliefs may reveal the conversations they have in Washington, DC, and Mar-a-Lago.

“This is my belief, and this is what I’ve been trying to tell people in Washington, that if you think social media management was bad, (AI) could be a thousand times worse,” said a16z co-founder Marc. Andreessen in a recent interview and Joe Rogan. “If you wanted to create a perfect dystopian world, you would have a world where everything is controlled by an AI that is designed to lie,” Andreessen said elsewhere. recent interview with Bari Weiss.

Andreessen also told Weiss that he has spent about half of his time with Trump’s team since the election, providing technical and business advice.

“(Andreessen) defined the approach we had with AI,” PayPal co-founder COO and Craft Ventures, David Sacks, said recently. post on X soon he was appointed Trump’s AI by the crypto czar. “But time has split, and we’re on a different path now.”

On All In – the famous podcast Sacks is together with other famous capitalists – Trump’s new AI adviser has repeatedly criticized Google and OpenAI because, as the presenters of the show explain, forcing AI chatbots to be politically correct.

“The concern with ChatGPT in the beginning was that it was designed to wake up, and that it did not provide real answers to people on many issues. The review was based on the answers,” said Sacks on All In phase from November 2023.

Despite Sacks’ claims, even Elon Musk admits that xAI chatter is often overblown politically correct more than he would like. It’s not because Grok is “programmed to wake up,” but it’s the reality of training AI on the open internet. That said, Sacks is making it clear every day that “honest AI” is something he’s focused on.

“This is how you find Black George Washington on Google”

The most cited case in AI analysis was when Google’s Gemini AI image generator was developed Many types of quizzes such as “US founding fathers” and “German soldiers in WWII,” which were obviously wrong.

But there are some examples of companies that affect real results. Recently, users discovered this ChatGPT does not only answer questions about other namesand OpenAI admitted that one of those names had launched an internal encryption tool. At one point, Google and Microsoft’s AI chatbots refused to say who they were won the 2020 US elections. In the 2024 election, almost all AI machines refused to answer questions about the election results, except Confusion and Grok.

In some of these examples, technology companies have argued that they are making a safe and fair choice for users. Sometimes, this can be true – Grok he was impressed with the outcome of the 2024 election before the votes were counted.

But the Gemini event continued; it caused Google to turn off Gemini’s ability to create images of people – something the free version of Gemini can’t do. Google called the incident a bug and apologized for “missing the mark.”

Andreessen and Sacks do not see this. All venture capitalists have said that Google didn’t miss a beat, but rather, it hit a little too hard. They saw it as a very important moment for Google.

“The people running Google AI are peddling their own preferences and biases, and those biases are very loose,” Sacks said. the All In section from February 2024, in response to what happened in Gemini. “Do I think they’re going to end racism? No, they’re going to do it very subtly. That’s what I think bothers me.”

“It’s 100% intentional; that’s how you find Black George Washington on Google,” Andreessen said recent interview with Weissrepeating the Gemini experience. “This goes back to Elon’s argument, which is that at the core of this, you have to train AI to lie (ie, to give Gemini-like answers).”

As Andreessen points out, Elon Musk has been speaking out against “social AI”. Musk originally developed his first AI startup, xAI, in 2023 to challenge OpenAI’s ChatGPT, which the billionaire said at the time was. suffering from the “woke mind virus”. Ultimately they created Grok, an AI chatbot with less security than other leading chatbots.

“I’m going to launch something you call TruthGPT or truth-seeking AI that tries to understand the universe,” Musk said. in an interview with Fox starting in 2023.

When Musk launched Grok, Sacks praised the effort: “Having something like Grok around — at least — keep OpenAI honest and keep ChatGPT honest,” said Trump’s AI czar. All Done from November 2023.

Now, Musk is doing more than just keeping ChatGPT honest. He said raised more than $12 billion to support xAI and compete with OpenAI. He also sings the introduction of Sam Altman and Microsoft, possibly halting OpenAI’s profit transition.

Musk’s influence over conservative government officials has already shown to carry some constituencies. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is investigating a group of advertisers who allegedly boycotted Elon Musk’s X. Musk sued the same group of advertisers, and since then, other companies they started advertising again on his platform.

It’s unclear what Trump and other Republicans will do if they want to investigate OpenAI or Google for AI research. It could be investigations by professional organizations, legal challenges, or a cultural issue that Trump can continue with for the next four years. Regardless of the way forward, Trump’s Silicon Valley advisers are not talking about the issue today.

“Elon, with the Twitter files, created a kind of privacy for what should be public,” Andreessen said. to Weissmeaning Musk’s comments on Twitter. “We, the American people, need to know what has been going on all this time, especially about the combination of government pressure and surveillance… There must be consequences.”