Mangione’s attorney says he will challenge the admissibility and accuracy of the forensic results

Luigi Mangione’s lawyer, who was accused in the fatal shooting of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, said he intends to challenge forensic evidence that police say connect their client to the crime scene.

New York Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch said Wednesday that three casings found at the scene of Thompson’s shooting in Manhattan match the ghost gun found in Mangione when he was arrested at a McDonald’s in Altoona, Pa., earlier this week.

Tisch also said crime lab results matched Mangione’s fingerprints to a water bottle and a Kind bar wrapper. found near the scene of the murder

In an interview with CNN’s “Erin Burnett OutFront” Wednesday evening, defense attorney Thomas Dickey questioned the accuracy of the evidence and said he would challenge its admissibility in court.

“I haven’t seen that evidence yet. Lawyers have to see evidence,” Dickey said in response to Tisch’s announcement about the evidence, adding, “Saying you have something and admitting it in court are two different things.”

Dickey said the fingerprint and ballistic teststhat the NYPD says it has, are “two sciences, in and of themselves,” that “have been subject to some criticism in the past, as to their credibility, their veracity, their accuracy, you name it “.

“That’s why, as lawyers, we have to see it, we have to see how it was collected, what amount matches,” he continued. “You know, I don’t want to get too technical, but fingerprints, they go along ridges, different things like that.”

Dickey also noted that he hopes to get his own experts and challenge them the admissibility of the test.

“And then we would have our experts,” he said. “We’re going to have experts take a look at it, and then we’re going to question its admissibility and challenge the accuracy of those results.”

Asked if he questions the methodology the NYPD is using to match fingerprints, Dickey said, “Well, I’d have to see.”

“I mean, anybody can say, if they’re going to use it, of course they’re going to say it,” he said. “But you have to see things.”

“And that’s why, you know, people have to keep an open mind,” the lawyer continued. “We’re going to have our day in court and we’re going to get that evidence. We can examine that evidence and challenge it, you know, even.”

Source link